weekly fodder for the flock...

Join our e-mail list!
Just type your e-mail address below and press submit.


 

















Question #4 

Old-Fashioned, Traditional or Principled?

By Cara Baker
September 18, 2000

HIM: I will IM first AGAIN.......
ME: what's up with that?
ME: why is it such a hardship for you to IM
me?

HIM: it is a pleasure....I just wish you would
take the pleasure every few months

ME: I'M A GIRL
HIM: that's funny...every other girl on here
has no problem IMing me first everytime
HIM: HAHA

I'm wondering if girls are becoming more aggressive these days with the advent of modern technology. I'm wondering if guys are even noticing or caring. I'm wondering if waiting for the guy to call or email is viewed as old-fashioned.

To me, while emailing or IMing (Instant Messaging) a guy on the Internet is decidedly more casual, it's almost the same as calling him.

What's the big deal with that? Well, if I'm willing to call a guy up, I'm probably willing to ask him out, too.  And I believe those initiating roles belong to the male. Not to get bogged down with the biblical principle of headship over one measly coffee date or a nightly Internet conversation, but it's the little foxes that spoil the vine, if you know what I mean.

Plus, letting the guy initiate matters will help put respect toward the girl in its proper place. When the girl is all too eager to make the first moves, she will soon be taken for granted.

This recent exchange (above) between a male friend and me over AOL Instant Messenger reaffirmed results of the Romance Survey when 17 percent of the females said they would ask a guy out and an overwhelming 68 percent of guys said they would accept!

Most females, out of the 83 percent that said they would not ask a guy out, sheepishly admitted feeling "old fashioned" or "traditional." The only place it's viewed as old-fashioned is in a secular media molded by years by the effects from feminist movements. Let’s stop taking cues from women's lib and start placing trust in the "tradition" of biblical principles.

"I believe there is a place of direction in every relationship," one answered. "A man has a God-given obligation to provide that direction or leadership in any romantic relationship. I believe that a man should ask initially to begin at ground zero in that obligation."

That response echoed the words of Christian author Elisabeth Elliot in Quest for Love. "As a single woman I had no question that it was man's responsibility to do the wooing," writes Elliot. "[A man] must learn to hold back his 'hunter' instinct, praying, watching, and trusting God to show him what to do and when. When he is shown, he is to act, accepting the demands of his headship and the sacrifice that goes with it."

ninetyandnine.com

Article © 2000, Cara Baker

-------

Cara Baker answers IMs from Ohio these days.

Return to Survey


contact information:   
Please let us know your opinion by giving feedback on an article or the site.
general information: general@ninetyandnine.com
copyright © 2005 www.ninetyandnine.com