

















|
Second
Novel Syndrome Destroys Another Author
The Almost
Moon--By Alice Sebold.
April 14, 2008
Little, Brown,
2007; 291 pp.
Reviewed
by Alison Andrews
I feel for Alice
Sebold, because when she wrote this
book, she was obviously suffering
from Second Novel Syndrome.
Her first novel,
The
Lovely Bones, was a No. 1 bestseller.
It sold millions of copies, and book clubs everywhere discussed
this beautifully written book in which a young girl is raped and
murdered by a serial killer at the beginning of the book, but--here's
the kicker--goes on to narrate the rest of the novel from heaven.
Despite its grim premise, The Lovely Bones manages to focus
on the good parts of life that Susie misses, and the family members
who must learn to move forward beyond their grief. I found it haunting
and poignant, if a bit far-fetched in places (for one thing, the
description of heaven as a school playground was a little odd to
me). Though it begins with death, it celebrates life.
When a writer
bursts out of obscurity with a highly-acclaimed book, though, everyone
eventually starts asking, “She did it once, can she do it again?”
Early in The Almost Moon, it becomes clear that Sebold hasn't
lived up to her first novel. Not even close.
Repetitive
Violence
Where did Sebold's
creative process begin to go wrong? For starters, it seems she thought,
“I started with a graphic murder before; now I'll do it again.”
It may not have been so blatant, but here's the opening sentence
of Moon: “When all is said and done, killing my mother came
easily.”
That's an
arresting first sentence; I'll grant her that. The problem is,
Helen Knightly's murder of her mother is not so easy for the
reader. For me, identification with Helen and her overwhelmingly
negative feelings toward her mother just never occurred. Sebold
wanted us to think, “Yes, it's awful that she killed her mother,
but given those circumstances, I can see how it happened. She was
driven to it.” In reality, I didn't feel sorry for Helen because
I just didn't like her. I didn't find any redeeming qualities
in her, despite Sebold's strenuous efforts to flesh out her
character with episodes from the past.
I once read
that the most important thing the writer needs to create in a novel
is a likable narrator. If that's true, then that's the reason
for my lack of engagement with The Almost Moon. Helen isn't
likable; not only does she kill her mother, but she also does other
morally repugnant things in the aftermath of the murder. I could
see that we were supposed to feel that her grasp on ordinary reality
had “snapped” and that she was suffering from some kind of post-traumatic
stress disorder, but I had no empathy for her. My experience of
the book was fated to be a negative one from then on. Helen doesn't
convince us that she loves anyone or anything (including her two
daughters), and that's a character most people don't want
to spend any time with.
Fully Commit
to the Theme
Maybe the real
problem is not that Sebold went too far, but that she didn't
go far enough. When I was in a fiction-writing class,
other students would write stories containing actions meant to shock,
yet despite how much they piled on the gore, their stories left
the readers unmoved. The professor explained that when you get started
with an idea, to make it work, you have to fully commit to it and
use it in virtually every paragraph, whether it's using run-on
sentences or violence. Not that I particularly enjoy reading
a book like that, but when it's done right, it can be powerful.
For an example
of an extreme case of a horrific mother-daughter relationship, see
Every
Day Is Mother's Day by Hilary
Mantel. In this black comedy, Mantel doesn't attempt to explain
the insanity and cruelty and slyness exhibited by her mother and
daughter characters, but she portrays it in such a vivid, original
way that any explanation would be superfluous.
By contrast,
all of Sebold's efforts to portray Helen's mother Clair
as a monster who created her murderer fall short of the mark. Clair
comes across as a narcissist with a mean mouth who responds to Helen's
news of her first pregnancy by saying, “You're throwing your
life away, you know that?” Helen's mother is certainly unpleasant,
but nothing here explains the matricide.
Diagnosis:
Crazy
One of the functions
of the novel, it seems to me, is to illuminate the truths of human
interactions. If Helen is as mentally ill as her mother--and really
it seems to me that she must be--there is no reason to write this
book, since every case of mental illness has its own rules and insane
logic that make it nearly impossible for us to empathize. (That
must be the reason Thomas Harris didn't make Hannibal Lecter
the narrator of his
novels.) As Michiko Kakutani writes
in her
review for The New York Times,
“It's
hard to write persuasive, complex novels or movies or television
episodes about mentally ill killers. Too often the explanation for
their crimes is simply that they're crazy….” Since Sebold doesn't
have the dark gift of making a murderer interesting, she should
try something completely different in her next novel. Maybe she
could even write a book in which no one gets killed.
ninetyandnine.com
© 2008, Alison
Andrews
----------
Alison Andrews
lives near Ft. Worth, Texas, with her husband and two young children.
She is always looking for a new favorite book.
|