Resolution 6
I know many of our readers are interested in the outcome of Resolution 6, so here's some information. Some of my fellow bloggers may have some additional information to share. I'm assuming that most of you are aware of what Resolution 6 is about so I will not cover that in this blog entry.
Resolution 6 brought out a high number of voting ministers for the Friday session. Right from the start this resolution was handled professionally, with courtesy, and with prayer, by the Chair, Rev. Kenneth Haney, General Superintendent of the UPCI.
Motion
Bro. Ron Mullings, District Superintendent of the Western District was the first to speak. He offered a motion that would refer Resolution 6 to a committee so that a study could be made on how this resolution would affect our fellowship as a whole.
Amendment
Bro. Kevin Prince, from Texas, offered an amendment to the motion that would stipulate the committee be made up of equal representation from both sides of the issue. In addition, individual ministers would be polled during the year with some direct questions relating to the resolution to get an idea of where people stood, with the results being communicated in the
Forward, the ministerial magazine of the UPCI. The amendment carried.
Secret Ballot
After several people spoke either for or against the motion, Bro. Haney then instructed the ushers to pass out ballots so a secret ballot could be taken on the motion, with the passed amendment. The ballots were collected and counted by the Tabulating Committee. The result was 992 for the motion and 978 against. The motion carried and Resolution 6 was sent to committee with the instructions to have a full report given at the 2007 GC in Tampa. Bro. Haney then had people stand and pray.
Here's where it gets interesting...
After all the resolutions had been heard, a motion was made to bring Resolution 6 back to the floor for reconsideration. The reason that was stated by the person bringing the motion was that an adequate assessment on how Resolution 6 might affect the UPCI would not be possible without having some test markets in which some ministers could try TV advertising.
Why was this interesting?
It is not uncommon by the end of the business meeting on Friday to be missing a lot of ministers who have already left. It was noticeably less full in the arena than it had been earlier. The possibility of Resolution 6 being revived with fewer ministers than had been in there earlier raised the possibility that the outcome could change. Since ministers who leave do so voluntarily, the issue cannot be raised that there are less people than when the original vote occurred. While there was debate going on about the current motion, cell phones must have been in great use because a noticeable group of people began to come back into the arena. After several had spoken either for or against the current motion, the question was called for. The Chair, Bro. Haney, asked for a standing vote and the motion was handily defeated. I'm not sure of the exact percentages, but a lot more stood up to defeat the current motion than to pass it.
Tampa 2007?
Whether another resolution dealing with TV advertising comes to the GC in 2007 remains to be seen; however the ministerial body of the UPCI will have a report by then on how TV advertising would affect the UPCI one way or another.
Rev. Kenneth Haney
Throughout this whole resolution, Bro. Haney conducted the business, and himself, admirably and with a Christ-like spirit, and there was a strong show of support from the ministers who were gathered as to how Resolution 6, and the rest of the business in general, was handled.
Comments
Since this resolution has generated a lot of passion on either side of the issue I am going to post a "Resolution 6 Comment Blog" for those of you who would like to weigh in. You're welcome to state your opinion one way or the other, but please do so respectfully and engage the issues rather than use sarcasm or some other negative way of communicating. Thank you, in advance, for helping to keep this "Live GC 2006" blog a fun place to visit. As always, you're welcome to write a
letter to the editor at 90 & 9 if you would like more space to state your views. Or, you can write an article and submit it for consideration for publishing!
Questions, comments, concerns? Please feel free to
E-mail me!