Identity Suppression?

Imagine a preacher trying to preach without clearly identifying his message. What would have happened if Peter and the rest of the disciples would have suppressed their true identity, and instead of preaching the hallmarks of the Apostolic faith, resorted to philosophy, non-evasive lectures, and double entendre’ speech? I’m safely assuming the results would not include a called out group of people who “turned the world upside down.” The reason the early church chose such an aggressive stance doctrinally and evangelistically was due to their understanding of Jesus’ teaching and lifestyle of how one should present the gospel without “watering” it down. Jesus was radical in his paradigm busting, e.g., he never had a problem reaching out to the lowest strata of society, yet he did not conform to their social mores (He did not become what they were to reach them). He never attempted to “soft sell,” use deceptive tactics, or “store front” his ministry. He wasn’t arrogant in His delivery, as the religious crowd called him a drunkard and sluggard, yet the people he associated with knew what he was about, and it didn’t take long for his audience to figure it out.
What does all that have to do with music?
Interestingly, this is a style for which some musicians and artists steer clear. They suppress the name Jesus, and all the other tenets of faith, for a strategy that attempts to draw in a larger crowd. So, you might hear their official line as “we are not a Christian group, band, etc., we just have a worldview that happens to be influenced by a Christian worldview.” Hence, the lyrics are positive and can be accepted by a mainstream audience, who will adapt and fit it into their own worldview (and maybe they will get interested and seek to know more with the end result being a life change). At face value this seems okay…after all, positive lyrics are much better than negative, carnal, secular values. However, the real benefactors are the band, group, or artists. With such a strategy they garner both Christian and secular audiences. The secular audience will be accepting as long as the religious envelope is not pushed. To build and maintain a larger audience base, without alienating the Christian segment nor the secular audience, the resulting equation is identity suppression for the sake of acceptance. Don’t really say who you are. Ensconce your worldview into your songs like a puzzle, because ultimately, the results will generate a bigger audience to “you.”
I don’t like such a purposeful musical approach. There is something refreshing to me to hear someone just come right out and respectfully (key word there) take a stand for what they believe, knowing that there will be some who will choose to shun the message and some who will listen. This seems to me to be the tactic of Jesus. He was never interested in a fan base. As a matter of fact, they made him nervous because he knew there were many following only because of the miracles, signs, and wonders. He was not about identity suppression, but identity expression. He was God incarnate in Christ Jesus and he certainly did not soft sell it.


5 Comments:
Kevin,
This was so well said. It reminded me of and article I ran across a couple of years ago called, "Saved A Wretch like who?" Basically the author, an English prof at Univ. of Illinois, documented how many hymnals are changing out "offensive" lyrics like "wretch" in Amaz Gr to "someone" or the word "worm" in At the Cross to "someone such as I." I'm not a wretch! Don't call me a worm! We're all good sinners - I haven't murdered anyone! The author went on to say something to the effect of "only a wretch needs amazing grace and only a worm truely acknowledges their need of the cross. I think this plays into your post here. Do you think musicians often back off the "unwatered-down" message for fear of offending? It's much easier to dance around the truth, especially when you're not sure you want to admit who you really are for fear of rejection. In that case, then, I have to wonder how much they really know and love Jesus to begin with. To know Him is CERTAINLY not to be ashamed of Him.
I believe that your underlying premise is wrong. You seem to be of the opinion that the only purpose for music is to proclaim the gospel. Imagine if we put these kinds of parameters on other areas of life. Suppose we only spoke to proclaim the gospel, a news commentator then would be out of bounds for reporting the news with a Christian world view, because he isn’t proclaiming the Gospel. Authors couldn’t write on topics that explore emotions, science, or even fiction for the sake of a good story unless they put the Gospel front and center. Music that explores God-given emotions, His creation, or even a fun song that makes you laugh are all proper uses of this gift, in my opinion. We seem to have set music aside as a sacred medium and any other use is taboo. I guess instrumental music is useless since it has no lyrics driving the Gospel message. Or could it be that a Christian who plays instrumental music may still have a witness that is different from what someone else in music is called to do?
Unfortunately, becoming more mainstream is necessary for things such as: eating. Bands/musicians would love to hammer down the word, I'm sure, but they would need a Day Job in order to survive. True, as you say, that Jesus was not looking for a fan base, fan being short for "fanatic," but was a teacher/rabboni who instructed, encouraged, and enlightened. And, like he told his disciples who asked about some other zealots who were preaching yet were not in the Jesus group: "It's okay dudes."
Degraffenreed,
My underlying premise is "I don't like such a purposeful approach." That conclusion was based on what preceded. A band or artist that purposely sets out to build a fan base at the expense of suppressing their identity is my point. The purpose for our existence is to spread the gospel in a variety of ways, music included. You can do all of your examples, fun songs, instrumental, explore emotions, commentate, educate, yada yada...but there will come a time when you will be called on your true identity. If the choice is to suppress it because your afraid of losing popularity, or fans, or becoming more "mainstream," ...suppression trumps expression.
Stu,
For the sake of interest, what if Jesus were an artist? Would he instruct, encourage, and enlighten with songs that were fun, instrumental, lighter lifting tunes, dude... Actually, I think he would because Jesus, though he was about his Father's business, no doubt celebrated life as the creator of it (this is another discussion). However, his mission would always trump his goals as an artist. He got ripped by his own people, the religious crowd, the zealots, and even his own disciples. For what? His expression, which was far more than teacher/rabbi. He claimed to be God and I think somewhere in his song set you would hear "Before Abraham was, I am"...or something like that. And that would be the time people hit the doors, and the label would cancel, and the rest of the glorious eating "mainstream" folk would call him a wacked out, disallusioned, heretic.
Your "they would have to get a day job" comment is corollary. I've met many who walked away from the music business because of its suppressing environment, as well as others attracted to it thinking they can maintain their expression (not just talking about lyrics but lifestyle) so they don't have to have a day job. In my humble experience, they don't do much influencing as much as acquiscencing to normative mainstream behavior.
Post a Comment
<< Home