26 July 2007

It’s Gotta Be The Atheists!

We can’t whine that the mainstream publishing industry is unreceptive, even hostile, to literature that has Christian characters, themes, and/or metaphors. There’s just too much evidence to the contrary. (And no, I’m not talking about Christian book publishers that, with few exceptions, are by Christians to Christians, and that only Christians know exist.)

Major awards and publicity have been given to overtly Christian literature in the last decade. To name just a few:

  • Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead, a book about an aging Calvinist minister writing to his young son (how’s that for an exciting concept?), won the Pulitzer Prize in 2005.
  • Kent Haruf’s Plainsong was fiction finalist for the National Book Award in 1999.
  • Leif Enger’s Peace Like a River (2001) was a Book of the Month choice and featured in an NPR book club discussion.
  • Brett Lott’s Jewel (1991) was an Oprah choice in 1999.
  • Still one of the most prestigious forums for short fiction, The Atlantic Monthly’s annual Fiction Issue (on newsstands now) features three (of six) short stories that involve religious faith. Last year, there was one—Tim Gautreaux’s “The Safe.”

True, it’s not an overabundance of riches, though once you start including highly-regarded authors who include Christians or characters struggling with God in their works, the list noticeably inflates.

Shooting The Canon

This doesn’t include the Western Canon, where two of the all-time best were Christians:

  • Many consider Dante’s Divine Comedy to be a greater poetic accomplishment than anything Shakespeare created.
  • Leo Tolstoy created two fascinating prose classics—War and Peace, Anna Karenina—that are too often known for their length instead of their brilliance. He was also a master of short stories (“Master and Man”) and novellas (The Death of Ivan Illych).

Then there’s these Christian slackers:

  • Flannery O’Conner’s short stories (“Parker’s Back,” “Revelation,” “A Good Man is Hard to Find”) were powerful enough to power her into the canon.
  • Graham Greene (The End of the Affair, The Power and the Glory, The Heart of the Matter) is said to have been short-listed for the Nobel Prize for literature.
  • C.S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia are undisputed children’s favorites.
  • Fyodor Dostoyevsky is still proclaimed the most psychologically astute novelist who has ever written, penning Crime and Punishment, Notes from the Underground, and The Brothers Karamazov.

Defining their Christianity is not my intent. Showcasing their unflinching portrayal of Christianity, its themes and characters, is.
The Truth We Ignore?
Publishing isn’t nearly as biased against Christian works as it is against inferior works, (though it sometimes seems too eager to publish the inferior). Perhaps the problem isn’t hostile atheists, but Apostolics unwilling to bleed on the page for their calling. Perhaps we’d rather kind of give it a go from the safety of our churches rather than dive into the requirements publishing today demands.

Like Christian musical artists unwilling to move to Nashville to risk their lucky break, we may find ourselves not attending writing conferences (where agents and publishers examine manuscripts), or taking writing courses with experienced professionals (that costs money!), or going the extra mile for our calling, then wonder why we can’t get connected to major publishers. Everything takes work.

Most of the titles mentioned are the current and classic standards of literary excellence. If we’re to continue this tradition we must read them, study them, love them, and then seek to build upon them..

I think we can do it. I know we will do it. Wanna be first?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Josh said...

"Publishing isn't nearly as biased against Christian works as it is against inferior works." Wow! Strong words! I think they could probably be applied to more than just publishing, though. What about songwriting? What about movie-making?

What about church services in general? Are we willing to put the hard work into what we are doing to make it pleasing to God and other people? Or do we just expect "annointing" to make up for our lack of preparation? We should not base everything we do on the opinions of the unchurched, but we should keep them in mind as we orchestrate a worship service that will likely be someone's first encounter with God. What does it really mean to offer a sacrifice of praise?

July 27, 2007 9:53 AM  
Blogger Alison said...

As a writer, I agree completely with your view that writers have to learn the craft as best as they possibly can. A work of art has to be the best we can make it, and when we make that commitment, it can glorify God.

However...I don't think writers should sit down, stare at the blank page, and say, "I'm going to write some Great Apostolic Literature today." That way paralysis lies. The creative process doesn't work that way--at least not if you don't want the message to seem like it's blaring in neon lights from each page: "BELIEVE THIS!" (That's the main issue I have with most exclusively Christian fiction, by the way; the works you mention don't do that, and are true works of art.)

The writer has to bleed onto the page, as you said. What you believe in your heart of hearts will come out as you tell your characters' story.

July 27, 2007 10:27 AM  
Blogger Alison said...

I forgot to add that the famous Chronicles of Narnia did not begin with C.S. Lewis deciding to write an allegory of Christianity. He always said it began with an idea of a faun and a lamppost in a snowy wood--the way the first book opens. Lewis' faith was so integral to his writing process that Aslan and the children's relationship naturally (supernaturally?) came to resemble ours with Christ.

July 27, 2007 10:30 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home