24 August 2007

Literature & Pentecostalisms

I’ve been mulling over what Pentecostal literature will look like some day. Obviously, anyone can insert a Pentecostal character into any type of fiction or a Pentecostal can win the Pulitzer Prize after writing a book that has nothing to do with the Apostolic movement. That’s not what I mean.

I’m contemplating the specific sensibilities, the touchstones of our worldview, that would best exhibit our Apostolic subculture through quality fiction.

To do that I’ve been reading a fair amount of Jewish short stories, trying to both expose myself to new authors and discern what makes them Jewish (besides the fact that they are written by Jews). Similar to Catholic literature’s hallmarks, it seems these stories often become “Jewish” when they’re constructed around certain Hebrew rituals, holidays or ceremonies, distinct archetypes (the rabbi, king Solomon), specific settings (Jewish ghettos in the older stories, sections of NYC in the contemporary), or a Jewish cultural outlook (the ages-old persecution, Orthodox rules, the Talmud).

Through a Glass Darkly
So far, it’s proven to be an uncertain guide.

The contemporary Apostolic movement eschews most rituals (not that we don’t have our own unchanging traditions), special holidays (witness the slow growth of our Pentecost Sunday celebrations), and archetypes (with only 100 years of history, we have no archetypes, just caricatures—the firebreathing preachers, the undereducated redneck congregants, the dowdy Sunday school teachers), we do offer some fascinating settings (Youth Congress, Soulwinning Boot Camp, Bible schools, camp meetings) and an unexplored cultural milieu.

We’re ripe for a novel of social manners (something Jane Austen executed brilliantly within the tiered society of early 19th century Britian), as there are so many little unwritten rules that transform us from hungry sinner to Holy Ghost-filled believer to jaded Professional Pentecostal if we’re not careful. Yet what exactly are those unwritten rules that an author could use to best illustrate our social manners?

There has to be a way for us to enter the literary hemisphere while still retaining our identity. Saul Bellow has done it for Jewish literature, Flannery O’Conner for Catholic fiction, and Marilynne Robinson has recently made Calvinism come alive in literature, so there’s no reason why we can’t create an entry point of our own.

Where Pentecostalisms Abound . . .
When I talk to Pentecostals about our identity, they instinctively start with the spiritual plane and the church building—services and altar calls and anointed singing—yet that’s not where most of us spend our time and energies each week; we spend it outside the church house, interacting with the physical world everyone else inhabits. Somehow, unless we are writing a satire on the workings of a church, we would have to offer a story that featured great characters, attractive settings, believable action, and still somehow exude our Pentecostal touchstones or, what I call, Pentecostalisms.

Penectostalisms are what we laugh at and weep over when someone just acted like us—but worse (better?). Besides our obvious fundamentalist doctrine and outward standards (and the pressures to conform to them), Pentecostalisms are also:

  • Our faith in the moving of the Holy Ghost to perform any biblical miracle today.
  • Talented musicians who can play any song ever written, but can’t read a note of music to save their life.
  • A defensive mindset toward “the World” despite Scripture telling us “Greater is He that is in You…”
  • Going out to eat after every service, rally, Bible quiz tournament, singspiration…
  • Almost no understanding of religious terms (the Eucharist, liturgy, the Ascension), while intuitively understanding exactly what they mean and represent.
  • A tremendous focus on winning the lost, with an amazing disinterest in discipleship.
  • Insisting on calling it the “Holy Ghost” while the rest of the Christian world names it the “Holy Spirit.”

Don’t get upset at my short list. These contradictions are what makes us lovably human—the hallmark of all great literature.

Of course, this isn’t all, or even close to all, of what makes our subculture sparkle. What do you see as essential Pentecostalisms any social novel should include to properly create literature that is still uniquely ours? Some have spoken, but I’d love to hear even more.

Share your favorite Pentecostalisms and related stories won’t you? For the best list and /or funniest examples I'll give away some books or something equally worthy! Comment away!

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Blogger aahrens said...

Kent,
This is so fascinating! Glad you brought it up. We are a funny lot, aren't we? I was thinking about your comment on the fact that we have no archetypes. Do you think it has something to do with the fact that we eschew the traditions of the denominal world because we're afraid we'll become like them or at least be associated with them? For instance, I know people who avoid certain song styles, even hymns because they sound "Baptist" or "Catholic". And one that you mentioned that absolutely drives me nuts - musicians who can play anything they HEAR, but not a note of music! I have actually been told that reading music makes one less, ahem, "Pentecostal", thus less "spiritual!" Of course you probably know how I feel about that....! We do tend to have a narrow view.

Another Pentecostalism that I always find fascinating is women's hair. Maybe it's because I'm at Bible College and that's where a lot of the new styles seem to get started. I look at some people as they walk out of here and think if I was in the world, I'd have the deer-in the-headlight look if I saw that! Oh and that reminds me - those terms "in church" or "in the world"- we could write a manual on our language that would go on all day!

Ann

August 24, 2007 11:00 AM  
Blogger Ron Giesecke said...

I mean this in the most endearing way:

As far as pentecostalisms go, I think one that stands out to me is the almost anachronistic term "Acid Rock Music" when employed to draw musical contrasts between modern Holy and profane offerings.

I'm always waiting for someone to deconstruct Woodstock right about the time I hear this one. :)

-R

August 25, 2007 12:57 AM  
Blogger Don Ryan said...

Interesting thoughts- I would offer a couple of additions. First, because as a movement we are relatively young (100 years) there is not a great amount of tradition to base stories upon. Second, ours is a faith that really doesn't translate well to the page as it is highly emotional in nature. Ever tried to read a condensed sermon? Me neither. It loses something from the pulpit to the page. I completely agree with your premise that we are undereducated regarding religion in general. It's hard to reach the religious when you have no common ground.

August 27, 2007 10:19 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home